May 31, 2022

How women are resisting Poland’s abortion ban


By Costanza Spocci
Published On 26 May 2022

 

In a Warsaw neighbourhood, the Ryz sisters spend the better part of an hour placing stickers with the numbers of pro-choice organisations [Alessandro Rampazzo]

Warsaw, Poland – On a cold, hazy December morning, the Ryz sisters stand on a sidewalk of a busy street in Warsaw.
 

“Shall we go to church?” 24-year-old Olympia asks her sister, Melania, grinning and holding up a dozen pink, yellow and grey stickers with the words, “Abortion is OK”, and the hotline numbers and social media profiles of Polish pro-choice organisations.


At the first church they encounter in the residential neighbourhood of Bródno, Olympia, who wears a black woollen cap over her long, blue hair, calmly peels the back off a sticker and sticks it on the gate.


She says they don’t want to anger anyone. “We are just helping Catholic women because they have abortions, too,” she says. “Our goal is to help all the women.”
The sisters are volunteers with the Aborcyjny (Abortion) Dream Team (ADT), a solidarity network supporting Polish women seeking an abortion.


The siblings, both medical students, spend a fair amount of their spare time answering the queries that come to ADT and spreading the numbers of civil society organisations across the Polish capital so that women in the city of about two million know who to contact if they have an unwanted pregnancy.


During the course of an hour, the sisters stroll around, placing stickers on bus stops, walls, streetlamps and a cigarette vending machine.


“A lot of football fans hang out here in Bródno,” says Melania, who is dressed in black like her sister and wears red lipstick and a beanie over her faded, red-dyed hair.


She points to an Ultras sticker on a traffic light pole. In Poland, hardcore football fan groups, or Ultras, often belong to far-right political movements with strong anti-abortion positions, the 25-year-old explains.


Bródno is home to a branch of Ultras supporting the Legia Warszawa football club and Melania, who lives nearby, frequently targets this “very conservative” neighbourhood. Her stickers get torn down, so she puts more up. She covers the Ultras sticker with one of her own. “It’s a fight,” she says.



Soaring abortion requests

Poland's near-total abortion ban went into effect on January 27, 2021, essentially barring women from access to legal abortions [Alessandro Rampazzo]

On October 22, 2020, Poland’s constitutional court ruled abortions for foetal defects were unconstitutional, introducing a near-total ban on terminations.


The ruling de facto barred women from accessing already highly restricted legal abortions. In 2019, 98 percent of the 1,100 legal abortions carried out in Polish hospitals were done so on the grounds of prenatal abnormalities.


The ruling went into effect on January 27, 2021, and abortion is now only permitted when there is a threat to a woman’s life and health, or in cases of rape or incest.
At present, women who have illegal terminations do not face any criminal penalties although a bill has been introduced to consider abortions a homicide.


The court decision came after years of ultra-conservative and ultra-nationalist pressure under the governing Law and Justice party (PiS). Since coming to power in 2015, PiS has repeatedly tried to curb sexual and reproductive rights. In 2016, a proposal supported by elements of the PiS to introduce a total abortion ban was abandoned after mass protests and the party was forced to take a step back.


In recent years, PiS’s grip on society and politics has intensified with the erosion of fundamental rights and unprecedented changes to the country’s judiciary, undermining the rule of law.
 

Since the near-total abortion ban took hold more than one year ago, terminations have not stopped. Women, unable to rely on the Polish health system, turned to pro-choice groups for help. The number of women contacting these networks seeking abortions has soared, according to activists.

How did this happen?

“More people now know where to get a safe abortion,” says Kinga Jelinska, the executive director of Women Help Women (WHW), an international non-profit providing access to abortion pills, used to terminate an early pregnancy, from abroad via post. While groups like hers know they cannot replace a fully functioning health system, in the absence of one, they have stepped up to help.

"Civil society organisations filled the void left by both the state and Polish medical institutions,” Jelinska says. “It’s the failure of the state, becoming every day more restrictive and repressive, clashing with the story of a grassroots resistance.”




Grassroots resistance

 

The Ryz sisters always have stickers with the contact details of pro-choice organisations in their pockets [Alessandro Rampazzo]

Immediately after the 2020 ruling, Poland’s pro-choice movement mobilised. The women’s rights movement, the All-Poland Women's Strike - the Ogólnopolski Strajk Kobiet (OSK) - started weeks of demonstrations.

Hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets across the country in numbers not seen since the fall of communism.

“We are present even in very small places in Poland; it's not just a movement about big cities,” says Klementyna Suchanow, a writer and co-organiser of the All-Poland Women's Strike.

Word spread on how to access abortion pills or surgical procedures abroad. There were demonstrations, workshops and online discussions with activists; flyers distributed with the slogan “Abortion is OK”; and the contact details of pro-choice organisations reached new people as activists left stickers in public spaces, supermarkets and transport.

Pan-European initiative Abortion Without Borders (AWB) was in 2021 contacted by nearly 33,000 Polish women seeking abortions, a five-fold increase from the previous year. AWB helped at least 1,500 women access abortions abroad.

WHW in 2021 helped more than 18,000 women access pills from abroad. Since 1997, it has been a punishable offence in Poland to sell abortion pills.




‘You’re not alone’


 
Olympia (L) and Melania Ryz are both medical students and activists with Abortion Dream Team [Alessandro Rampazzo]

In Melania’s cosy, bright eighth-floor apartment, one cat hops onto the sofa while the second curls up next to the Ryz sisters who drink tea and share a cigarette in the living room. A red-and-white megaphone leans against a table, plants and pro-choice demonstration signs are scattered throughout and an All-Poland Women’s Strike poster hangs at the entrance to the one-bedroom apartment.

The sisters’ phones blink from time to time with messages from women writing to ADT’s Instagram account.

ADT’s volunteers – 13 women and a man all between 23 and 35 years of age – answer questions about how abortion works and how to use pills at home, always referring to World Health Organization guidelines.

ADT connects women requiring pills to Netherlands-based WHW where tablets can be ordered with a donation of 75 euros ($80) or the amount the person can afford. If the person cannot afford a donation, the pills are sent for free. The tablets are mailed directly to the woman’s home in a small, discrete package and arrive within 20 days.

Olympia, who works in a hospital and will become a doctor at the end of this year, wants, like her sister, to specialise in gynaecology. “Why not work and do activism at the same time, I mean as one job?” says Olympia, who considers her activism a “human duty” and access to safe abortion, a basic right. “People need to have access to safe pills and knowledge,” she says.

The women who contact ADT come from different social backgrounds and are of all ages, from teenagers who have just had their first sexual experience to women who already have multiple children. In recent months, some 300 Ukrainian refugees have sought help.

Some of those contacting ADT are survivors of rape. Others have already passed the 12th week of gestation when the pills may not be effective. At this point, they either need to travel abroad for a procedure – ADT connects them to other organisations that can help – or attempt the near-impossible mission of getting an abortion in a Polish public hospital.

Julianna, 19, wrote on the ADT website that she ordered pills after finding out that she was six weeks pregnant. The abortion “hurt (physically) unmercifully. Huge cramps, huge amounts of blood,” she wrote. But after the bleeding stopped, the pain did, too. “I was and am free. I don't regret anything.”

Stories like Julianna’s are increasingly frequent according to ADT volunteers, who also re-direct callers to specialists such as gynaecologists or psychiatrists, and other pro-choice organisations like AWB or Poland’s Federation for Women and Family Planning (FEDERA), which assists with legal and mental health issues.

“We’ll always tell them, ‘You're not alone,’ because this is what they actually need: someone to be with them,” Melania says. “Our mama was a feminist, so that’s how we were brought up with this spirit.” But their activism upsets their much-loved grandmother.

“Our grandmother hates us for what we are doing,” says Olympia with a hint of mischief. “She's praying for us every day because she believes we are killing babies.”


‘Now women will die’

After the 2020 abortion ruling, Katarzyna Kotula, an opposition politician, remembers thinking, “Now women will die …We would only wait for the first name, the first victim, to be all over the media” [Alessandro Rampazzo]

 Since abortions have been widely considered taboo in Poland, the subject of surgical abortion has been often poorly taught or ignored in medical school, meaning there is a shortage of doctors trained in terminations, according to Melania who will soon start a five-year specialisation in gynaecology.

Many senior gynaecologists she worked with while rotating departments in a hospital were clueless about how to perform abortions, not having been trained how to operate in the instances when they would be legal.

So the sisters have organised theoretical training with fellow medical students. “Because in universities they won’t teach us how to do it,” says Olympia. The sisters also considering studying in Germany where they believe they’ll receive better gynaecological training.

In Polish hospitals, it’s not just a question of training - many doctors fear performing an abortion.

Anyone found guilty of assisting an illegal abortion faces up to three years in jail and, according to a 1993 law, practitioners can lose their medical licence for up to 10 years.

Activist and ADT co-founder Justyna Wydrzyńska, 47, currently faces a three-year prison term for directly providing abortion pills to a pregnant woman facing domestic abuse.

So far, no doctors have been jailed. Still, hospital personnel, terrified of being accused of assisting an illegal abortion, are scared to navigate the new anti-abortion law because it is not clear when an abortion can be performed.

Immediately after the constitutional court’s 2020 decision, Katarzyna Kotula, an opposition politician, remembers feeling furious and powerless and thinking, “Now women will die …We would only wait for the first name, the first victim, to be all over the media.”

A 30-year-old woman identified as Izabela was first.

In September 2021, in a hospital in the town of Pszczyna in southern Poland, Izabela died of septic shock 22 weeks into her pregnancy. The pregnancy had complications yet doctors refused to perform a life-saving abortion or C-section out of fear of breaking the law as the foetus’ heart was still beating. So, they waited.

“It’s the so-called ‘frozen effect’,” Kotula says. “This creates monsters.”

Then on January 25, Agnieszka T died.

She was admitted to a hospital in the city of Czestochowa on December 21 with abdominal pain, carrying first trimester twins in her womb. Two days later, one twin died. Agnieszka’s health quickly started deteriorating, but doctors waited another week to remove the foetus from the mother’s womb. They only did so when the second twin’s heartbeat stopped. Her family claim she died of septic shock. The hospital has refused to share Agnieszka T’s medical tests on the grounds of confidentiality.

The frozen effect among practitioners is widespread. “The problem is systemic,” says Kotula.


‘A fine line’

Dr Anna Parzińska, a gynaecologist, works at Warsaw’s Bielański Hospital, which has come under fire from anti-abortion politicians and movements and faced government scrutiny as it carries out more abortions than the average facility [Alessandro Rampazzo]  

But there are exceptions.

Anna Parzińska, a gynaecologist in her early 40s, works at Warsaw’s Bielański Hospital. It is known nationwide for performing more abortions than the average facility, around 150 to 200 per year, Dr Parzińska says.

The hospital has come under fire from anti-abortion politicians and movements many times. In late December, the hospital was inspected by a government-appointed specialist and asked to provide documents related to approved terminations, among other pregnancy-related data.

“I guess it's because we still perform the abortions,” Dr Parzińska says, referring to the inspection. “But of course, we perform them according to the law and according to medical ethics.”

Dr Parzińska is among the few gynaecologists at Bielanksi willing to perform abortions since the ruling came into effect. “I would say there’s just four of us,” she says, referring to the hospital’s nine specialists. Moreover, she has spoken out about the atmosphere of fear the law creates.

In an interview at her home while she is on maternity leave, Dr Parzińska, whose clear blue eyes held a steady gaze, chose her words carefully.

“I can terminate pregnancies only if they are life-threatening,” she says, sitting on a couch in her living room, her baby girl on her knees.

She is aware that she could end up in jail. “There’s a really fine line between the procedures that are done according to the law and which are not. That’s why no one wants to get involved,” she says.

Most of the women who come to her for an abortion are usually in an advanced state of pregnancy when their prenatal testing has revealed severe foetal abnormalities, she explains.

“[More than] a year ago, in such cases, I could give the woman an opportunity to decide whether she wants to continue her pregnancy or not. Right now, neither she nor I have any options,” Dr Parzińska says. "Because according to a new law we have to continue the pregnancy no matter how bad the foetus’s malformation is.”

Parzińska, who believes a woman should have the right to an abortion, asks her patient how they feel about continuing the pregnancy. If they mention mental health issues or suicidal thoughts, “then I tell her to go to the psychiatrist and come back with a letter.”




Psychiatric grounds for abortion


Dr Herman says it’s her duty as a psychiatrist to help women facing psychological distress due to an unwanted baby access an abortion [Alessandro Rampazzo]
 

Psychiatrist Maja Herman, tall and elegantly dressed, works in a private clinic in the neighbourhood of Mirów.

Dr Herman believes women have the right to an abortion and, with that right taken away, says it’s her duty as a doctor to help women facing psychological distress due to an unwanted baby access an abortion.

“We medical doctors have to speak loud because, in the crowd, they [the government] will struggle to come after us,” says Dr Herman, who refuses to give in to the fear affecting many medical professionals.

Women wanting to terminate their pregnancy on psychiatric grounds must present the hospital with two documents signed by two different psychiatrists attesting to their life or mental health being at risk. Dr Herman usually signs this document if after an evaluation she deems a pregnancy to threaten her patient’s mental health.

“The most dangerous part of mental health is stress because it can bring to alcoholism, psychosis, and attempts of suicide,” she says, and an unwanted baby is “a continuous and enormous amount of stress”.

Since the ban came into effect, Dr Herman gets at least five more patients a month coming to consult her on abortions.

The more devastated ones, Dr Herman reports, are women who have tried hard to have a baby – many using IVF – and because of severe malformations want to abort since their baby is likely to die soon after being born – in one case, a woman was carrying a foetus without a properly formed brain – or would be seriously physically compromised.

Often, these women are in an advanced stage of pregnancy. Sometimes, they arrive too late and must travel abroad for surgery, or give birth.

Some patients who continued their pregnancies later developed postpartum depression and even more serious mental disorders. Among them was a death by suicide, Dr Herman recalls with pain.

It is inhumane to force a woman to deliver a child that will die upon birth, Dr Herman says, citing what some of her patients have endured.

Even in the worst clinical cases, however, each step to obtain a legal abortion in a Polish public hospital is difficult and tiring. If a woman manages to find two psychiatrists who agree to write a letter, she then needs to find a hospital and doctors willing to perform the abortion.

Sometimes the procedure, which to secure is already a heroic feat, is split between two different hospitals. “It’s a trick doctors do to avoid direct responsibilities,” Dr Herman says.

Some doctors may not even tell their patients when a termination is possible.



Social stigma



 
A block away from Dr Herman's office, a giant mural depicting a pregnant woman covers the side of a building. It promotes “Divine Mothers”, a programme for pregnant women with cancer that advocates for oncological treatment and pregnancy preservation [Alessandro Rampazzo]

The pressure on doctors, and the bureaucratic difficulties women face, are just the tip of the iceberg.

The sigma of abortion is deeply rooted in society, with the public narrative around it highly influenced by the Polish Catholic Church, which is strongly embedded in Polish culture and politics, due to the historical role it played in shaping the nation.

The Church lent important political and organisational support to Solidarnosc, the Polish trade union, led by Lech Wałęsa, a fervent Catholic and staunch opponent of abortion, who guided the country’s peaceful transition to the modern Polish state after the Soviet Union’s collapse in 1989.

“Every life is holy, and for this reason, it must be protected. No one has the right to end a life artificially,” says Leszek Gesiak, spokesperson of the Polish Episcopal Conference, the Church’s central organisational body.

“The foetus is even invested with the right of inheritance,” says Gesiak, who in an interview at the Conference headquarters in Warsaw does not refer to mothers’ rights until explicitly asked.

“Of course,” he answers. “Mothers have rights, too; the same as the foetuses.”



‘A tool of control’


Ola, who advocates for sexual reproductive rights, says she is still working to overcome the guilt she felt after having an abortion in 2020. “We need a de-medicalisation, de-criminalisation and a de-stigmatisation of abortion," she says [Alessandro Rampazzo]

On the other side of the city, Ola, 24, an independent sex worker, pro-choice activist and podcast host, sits cross-legged on the floor of her bedroom.

“Abortion is [used as a] a tool of control on women by men,” she says. “This is the root of patriarchy, and we need to fight this … having an abortion is an act of revolution and emancipation.”

In October 2020, in the same week as the constitutional tribunal’s ruling and as the streets erupted in protest, Ola took abortion pills. She took a bath – something she later learned she should not have done – and they did not work.

She had been in a new relationship with a man from her hometown near the Poland-Belarus border when she got pregnant. Neither wanted a baby and soon after moving to Warsaw, they broke up. She found a new home and asked some friends and activists to help her find abortion pills a second time and assist her with the process. This time they worked. “I don’t know what I would have done without them,” she says.

Olympia, who sits on the other side of the room, became friends with Ola after they met two years ago in a workshop called Abortion Without Stigma.

“In those weeks,” Olympia says, “anti-abortion posters and billboards haunted Warsaw”. Some depicted baby Jesus, and others newborns saying, “I am dependent on you and I trust you”, she says, recalling the text in her own words.

Ola shakes her ginger-coloured hair. She says she still needs to “de-construct the sense of guilt” Polish society imposed on her. For a long time, she was consumed by shame: “I felt terrible. I kept asking myself whether I had done something wrong … I thought I had become a bad person.”

Still, Ola, who has advocated publicly for sexual reproductive rights, is unequivocal about what needs to change. “We need a de-medicalisation, de-criminalisation and a de-stigmatisation of abortion, and we’ll keep fighting until we reach our goal,” she says.



Threats to activists



But it’s not easy to talk about abortion rights in Poland. For those who do, threats are commonplace.

The FEDERA office is weekly proof of this.

“On today's vandalising menu, we've got pissed upon and smeared in dog poop,” says Antonina Lewandowska, a bright 25-year-old who volunteers at FEDERA.

She points at the door to the organisation’s headquarters. Someone has stuck gum inside one of the locks to make it harder to get into the office, and wrote "to gas", which Lewandoska explains is “a common hate slur, basically means go to the gas chamber, Auschwitz-like vibes”.

FEDERA has been working on a civic draft bill to liberalise access to abortion in Poland to put it on par with Western European standards, which allow terminations until the 12th week of gestation.

FEDERA’s members often receive mail with statements such as, “Abortion is a crime” and “You’ll burn in hell”.

“This is our daily bread,” says Lewandoska wryly.

But they also have received death threats. “I got an email with my picture edited like I'm held at gunpoint, saying I had five days left,” says Lewandowska. Her colleagues received the same message. “Everyone is still alive,” says Lewandowska in a joking way. “But it’s scary.”

Suchanow of the All-Poland Women's Strike has also faced repeated threats.

She has been a key target of anti-abortion groups and the authorities. Suchanow told Al Jazeera that on Christmas eve in 2020, Polish police knocked on her door and entered without a warrant or explanation. It was intimidation, she says.

In her 2020 book, This is War. Women, Fundamentalists, and the New Middle Ages, Suchanow described how religious bodies and ultra-conservative civil movements have, in recent years, become important power structures in the Polish political arena.

Among them, Suchanow says, the think-tank Ordo Iuris is one of the most influential. Established in 2013, Ordo luris was inspired by Tradition, Family, Property, a global ultra-Catholic movement that has been accused of being a cult. Increasingly, conservative parties like PiS rely on Ordo luris for their policies, specifically those that are anti-abortion, anti-contraception, and that have to do with banning sex education in schools and the “preservation” of heterosexual marriage.

Ordo Iuris’ members currently hold key positions in Polish state institutions. For example,  Aleksander Stępkowski, one of Ordo Iuris’ founders and its former president, is now the spokesperson of the Polish supreme court. Previously, he was the deputy minister of foreign affairs and in 2019, the government nominated him to be a judge at the European Court of Human Rights.



Push to register pregnant women
People walk in central Warsaw. In November 2021 in the capital and in many other cities took place huge demonstrations after the death of Iza, a 32 years old woman who perished for septicaemia while waiting for her foetus to die before receiving an abortion
In late 2021 a proposal was published to introduce an official registry of all pregnant women in the country that would also force doctors to report their patients’ pregnancies and miscarriages [Alessandro Rampazzo]


In 2016, Ordo luris, with the support of elements of the Polish Catholic Church and PiS, proposed a total abortion ban and imprisonment for any woman who had an abortion. Pro-choice demonstrations filled Warsaw’s streets, and the law did not pass.

However, another proposal pushed by Ordo Iuris in 2017 passed: up to three years’ imprisonment for carrying out or assisting an illegal abortion.

In December 2021, on the wave of the same initiative, the Sejm - the lower house of parliament - voted again on criminalising women, including with life imprisonment. The law did not pass.

But pro-choice organisations fear that this draft bill will be making its way back. Especially because the Polish health ministry in November 2021 published a proposal to introduce an official registry of all pregnant women in the country that would also force doctors to report all their patients’ pregnancies and miscarriages.



Nikodem Bernaciak, 27, analyst for the legal analysis centre Ordo Iuris. Ordo Iuris is a very conservative organisation with connections in the Polish political and legal environment. This institution lobbied the government heavily to pass the anti-abortion law
"We would like to give Polish judges this possibility to punish women committing abortion," says Nikodem Bernaciac, a trainee attorney with Ordo luris [Alessandro Rampazzo]


On the eighth floor of Warsaw’s historic PAST-a building, the skyscraper symbol of the city’s 1944 uprising against Nazi occupation, a glass door displaying a giant golden lion welcomes visitors to the Ordo Iuris headquarters.

Nikodem Bernaciac, 27, a trainee attorney, described the institute’s vision: “You can't sacrifice an innocent child for some ‘bad mood’, that may last for weeks or months.”

That is why, he explained, “We would like to give Polish judges this possibility to punish women committing abortion,” because, “Now there is some kind of automatism according to which every woman who committed abortion is automatically innocent.”

There are some women, he says, who might need to abort. “Of course, they can decide to kill their babies to save their own life, they have the choice,” but there are also other “types of women”, he states, who should be punished. “The women that make political declarations about their abortion.”


'Abortion was the only option'
Hania Zagula, 28, is a young activist for human rights and particularly active with LGBTQ+ people’s rights
Activist Hania Zagulska, 30, says it's hard to speak publically about abortion but she is determined to continue as she sees it as a crucial step toward lifting the stigma of abortion [Alessandro Rampazzo]


In her apartment in eastern Warsaw, Hania Zagulska, 30, an activist who works as a cleaner, prepares some coffee. She still remembers the stigma she experienced when she had an abortion eight years ago.

“I had lived my whole life in a small town,” Hania recalls of her upbringing in Szamotuły in western Poland. “I had no information about abortion at that time.”

At 22, she became pregnant. The man who got her pregnant left and she could not tell her conservative family. She was on her own. “Abortion was the only option to save my life,” she says. “Being a mother at 22 wasn’t the future I wanted for myself.”

Having never received sex education, she did not know what to do, so she searched online. On a forum called Women on Web, she found information on how to buy and take abortion pills. She asked five of her closest friends from school to help collect money and buy the tablets. The first time, the pills went missing. Hania thinks they were intercepted by the police. She tried again with a new address and succeeded.

The day she took the pills, she went to her best friend’s place to watch a movie and tried to relax. “I was really nervous, but nothing bad happened that day.” But a week later, she had heavy bleeding, which scared her, so she went to the doctor, prepared to say what many others say when they take abortion pills: “I’ve lost the baby.”

At the clinic, the doctor kept pushing her to confess she had taken pills. “He tried to scare me,” she says. “The doctor then told me I was pregnant anyways and called an ambulance to take me to the hospital against my will,” remembers Hania. “I was very afraid the pills didn't work.”

But other women heard the conversation, and when Hania went into the waiting room while the ambulance was on its way, they gave her courage, saying, “Child, you are so young, you have your whole life before you."

Hania was forced to stay in the hospital for four days. She recalls the medical personnel telling her she was pregnant, probably to punish her, Hania thinks, even if she wasn’t as she realised later the pills had worked. The only way to leave the hospital was to call her father who, when he saw Hania lying in her hospital bed, was angry and disdainful.

For a long time, Hania told no one about her abortion. Then one day she and two friends got talking and discovered they’d all had an abortion. Hania was relieved to know other women had similar experiences and she felt less lonely. It got her thinking: This stigma had to end. It affected her and her friends – it must affect so many other women. Watching a TED Talk with a feminist talking about creating safe spaces for women to share their lived experiences was the push she needed. If she shared her story, maybe others would start speaking about their own and start a bigger discussion for change.

Hania spoke about her abortion in December 2020 on Stonewall TV, a sex education YouTube channel with an LGBT+ perspective, in an episode titled, Aborcja jest ok! (Abortion is OK).

She did not think that the reaction would be so intense. The video of her interview on Stonewall TV went viral. Pro-government journalists dug into her past to undermine her reputation and she was harassed online. She was called names, misinterpreted, and faced online abuse on Twitter, as well as threats of rape and acid attacks. In January, after consulting a psychologist, she deleted her account.

“It was hard, and it is still hard,” Hania says. But she knows that speaking publicly is a step toward lifting the stigma of abortion and moving towards its legalisation. “So I keep going.”



Starting to talk
Olimpia and Melania live in Warsaw outskirts and in their free time they do different kinds of activism, both in the area and around town
The Ryz sisters say that in the past year, pro-choice voices have gotten louder [Alessandro Rampazzo]


It is around lunchtime back in Melania’s apartment, and the Ryz sisters sit on the couch drinking black tea, the faint sounds of the motorway audible in the background.

The abortion ban was devastating for women, Olympia says, but she feels attitudes have changed for the better in the past year. “People started to talk about abortion,” she says.

University students have started voicing their support for abortion, Melania says, and they ask her for stickers to put around campus and the city.

Both sisters believe this change in conversation will help spread more knowledge within society, and that this will be essential to fight new restrictions, which they are bracing for. By arming themselves with knowledge, women can take control of their bodies, Olympia says. “They can be free from any government.”

Correction May 26, 2022: This article originally said Hania's surname is Zagula. It is Zagulska.

Culled, al-jazeera.com


May 30, 2022

Who is the toughest person who ever lived?

Hugh Glass


In 1822, Glass responded to an advertisement in the Missouri Gazette and Public Advertiser placed by General William Henry Ashley, which called for a corps of 100 men to "ascend the river Missouri" as part of a fur-trading venture. Many others, who later earned reputations as famous mountain men, also joined the enterprise, including James Beckwourth, John Fitzgerald, David Jackson, Giles Roberts, William Sublette, Jim Bridger, Thomas Fitzpatrick, and Jedediah Smith. These men and others would later be known as "Ashley's Hundred".

The expedition was attacked in June 1823 by Arikara warriors, and Glass was apparently shot in the leg. Fearing that continuing up the Missouri would make them vulnerable to further attack, some of the party, including Glass, chose to travel overland towards the Yellowstone River.

Glass wrote a letter to the parents of John S. Gardner, killed on June 2, 1823:

Dr Sir: My painful duty it is to tell you of the death of your son who befell at the hands of the Indians 2nd June in the early morning. He died a little while after he was shot and asked me to inform you of his sad fate.

We brought him to the ship when he soon died. Mr. Smith a young man of our company made a powerful prayer who moved us all greatly and I am persuaded John died in peace. His body we buried with others near this camp and marked the grave with a log. His things we will send to you. The savages are greatly treacherous.

We traded with them as friends but after a great storm of rain and thunder they came at us before light and many were hurt. I myself was shot in the leg. Master Ashley is bound to stay in these parts till the traitors are rightly punished. Yr Obt Svt Hugh Glass

Grizzly bear mauling

Near the forks of the Grand River, near present-day Shadehill Reservoir, Perkins County, South Dakota, while scouting for game for the expedition larder, Glass surprised and disturbed a grizzly bear with two cubs. The bear charged, picked him up, bit and lacerated his flesh, severely wounded him, and forced him to the ground. Glass nevertheless managed to kill the bear with help from his trapping partners, John S. Fitzgerald and Jim Bridger, but was left badly mauled and unconscious. General Ashley, who was also with them, became convinced Glass would not survive his injuries.

Ashley asked for two volunteers to stay with Glass until he died and then bury him. Fitzgerald and Bridger stepped forward, and as the rest of the party moved on, began digging his grave. Later, claiming that they were interrupted by attacking Arikara, the pair grabbed the rifle, knife, and other equipment belonging to Glass, and took flight. Bridger and Fitzgerald later caught up with the party and incorrectly reported to Ashley that Glass had died. There is a debate whether Bridger was one of the men who abandoned Glass.

The 200 mile route of the 1823 odyssey by Glass

Despite his injuries, Glass regained consciousness, but found himself abandoned, without weapons or equipment. He had festering wounds, a broken leg, and deep cuts on his back that exposed his bare ribs. Glass lay mutilated and alone, more than 200 miles (320 km) from the nearest American settlement, at Fort Kiowa, on the Missouri River. Glass set the bone of his own leg, wrapped himself in the bear hide his companions had placed over him as a shroud, and began crawling back to Fort Kiowa. To prevent gangrene, Glass allowed maggots to eat the dead, infected flesh in his wounds.

Using Thunder Butte as a navigational landmark, Glass crawled overland south toward the Cheyenne River where he fashioned a crude raft and floated downstream to Fort Kiowa. The journey took him six weeks. He survived mostly on wild berries and roots. On one occasion, he was able to drive two wolves from a downed bison calf and feast on the raw meat. Glass was aided by friendly Native Americans who sewed a bear hide to his back to cover the exposed wounds and provided him with food and weapons.

Pursuit of Fitzgerald and Bridger

After recovering from his wounds, Glass set out again to find Fitzgerald and Bridger. He eventually traveled to Fort Henry on the Yellowstone River but found it deserted. A note indicated that Andrew Henry and company had relocated to a new camp at the mouth of the Bighorn River. Arriving there, Glass found Bridger, but apparently forgave him because of his youth, and then re-enlisted with Ashley's company.

Glass later learned that Fitzgerald had joined the army and was stationed at Fort Atkinson in present-day Nebraska. He traveled there as well, where Fitzgerald returned his stolen rifle. Glass reportedly spared Fitzgerald's life because he would be killed by the army captain for killing a soldier of the United States Army. However the captain asked Fitzgerald to return the stolen Hawken rifle to Glass, and before departing Glass warned Fitzgerald never to leave the army, or he would still kill him. According to Yount's story, Glass also obtained $300 as compensation.

Source :- Wikipedia

Aryaan Sarwar, works at Computer Networking
Answered Nov 29, 2016 · Upvoted by
D. Braudrick, B.A. English Literature & History, University of Arizona (1974)
Originally Answered: Who do you think is the toughest person who ever lived?

What does it mean when a snake wiggles its tail


 


Rattlesnakes receive their name from the rattle located at the end of their tails, which makes a loud noise when vibrated.

Its function is to deter predators and warn passers-by of their presence.

Rattlesnakes are the leading contributor to snakebite injuries in North America, however, they rarely bite, unless provoked or threatened.

In Australia, snakes have “less polite” manners to warn you for their presence: a “dry bite”.

In other words, a bite without venom.

This can be the result of many factors and not only the necessity of preserving venom: gland infection, obstruction or simple distance misjudgment, are just a few of the reasons.

Juvenile snakes are less likely to preserve their venom and usually empty their glands entirely, making them more dangerous than their mature counterparts.

Older snakes can replenish venom quicker after it has been depleted, but are more likely to have calcified or obstructed venom ducts.

Interestingly, the percentage of dry-bites varies greatly between species: from very common in the Eastern Brown Snake (80%) to rarely in the taipans (5%).

Who was Árpád, the founding father of Hungary? 

Árpád was the head of the confederation of the Hungarian tribes at the turn of the 9th and 10th centuries. He might have been either the sacred ruler or kende of the Hungarians, or their military leader or gyula, although most details of his life are debated by historians. Many Hungarians refer to him as the "founder of our country", and Árpád's preeminent role in the Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin has been emphasized by some later chronicles. The dynasty descending from Árpád ruled the Kingdom of Hungary until 1301.


The Byzantine Emperor Constantine Porphyrogenitus states that the Hungarians "had never at any time had any other prince" before Árpád, which is in sharp contrast to the Hungarian chronicles' report of the position of Árpád's father, Álmos. In Porphyrogenitus's narration, the Khazar khagan initiated the centralization of the command of the Hungarian tribes in order to strengthen his own suzerainty over them. Árpád was made "prince according to the custom ... of the Chazars, by lifting him upon a shield." Around 894 AD, encouraged by the Byzantines, a Hungarian army crossed the Danube on Byzantine ships to attack Bulgaria. The Hungarian army defeated the Bulgarians, but the latter hired the Pechenegs against them. The Bulgarians and Pechenegs simultaneously invaded the Hungarians' dwelling territories in the western regions of the Pontic steppes.

The destruction of their dwelling places caused the Hungarians to leave for a new homeland across the Carpathian Mountains towards the Pannonian Plain. The Illuminated Chronicle says that Árpád's father Álmos "could not enter Pannonia, for he was killed in Erdelw" or Transylvania. Historians who accept the reliability of this report, write that Álmos's death was a ritual murder, similar to the sacrifice of the Khazar khagans. The last mention of Álmos in the contrasting narration of the Gesta Hungarorum is connected to a siege of Ungvár (now Uzhhorod, Ukraine) by the Hungarians. The latter chronicle says that Álmos appointed Árpád "as leader and master" of the Hungarians on this occasion. Hungarian chronicles written centuries after the events—for instance, the Gesta Hungarorum and the Illuminated Chronicle—emphasize Árpád's pre-eminent role in the conquest of the Carpathian Basin. The Gesta Hungarorum also highlights Árpád's military skills and his generosity. The date of Árpád's death is debated. The Gesta Hungarorum states that he died in 907. Many historians believe that he died at the Battle of Pressburg, but there is no proof for this. If the Gesta's report on his funeral is reliable, Árpád was buried "at the head of a small river that flows through a stone culvert to the city of King Attila" where a village, Fehéregyháza, developed near Buda, after the Christianization of Hungary. The village still existed during the reign of King Matthias Corvinus, but disappeared in the following tumultuous period.

May 24, 2022

Which celebrities married relatives of other celebrities?


Chris Pratt is married to Arnold Schwarzenegger's daughter, Katherine. He has often shared his love for his wife and their daughter on social media, and not only is their relationship a great one, but he also has a great relationship with Arnold.

When Chris and Katherine started dating, Chris spent time alone with Arnold and they bonded in the most Schwarzenegger place possible. The gym. Arnold told USA Today:


When I watched him make his moves in the gym, the incline press specifically did it. That's why I wanted him to become my son-in-law.


And he later told Jimmy Kimmel:


I'm really happy that he is such a great guy. Not only a very talented guy and a great actor and a great star and all this stuff, but a really kind man and kind to my daughter, which is the most important thing for me.


Thank you for reading.

How did Russian citizens view Former President Barack Obama?

Obama was viewed very poorly in Russia. This came from several factors.

National pride

When Obama came to town, Russia was pulsating with a fresh boost of self-confidence that came with the sudden windfall of petroleum bonanza. The country was awash with money, and a new amazing world of possibilities opened up. The US in the meantime kept viewing us as a marginal player, who had little significance for the matters they had at the top of their agenda.

The worst slight you can give to us Russians is to ignore us. Obama’s attitude to Russia during his entire presidency was one of benevolent indifference, mixed with occasional annoyance. We never forget that.

Racism

I was not aware of the degree of racism that our confrontation with the US during Obama’s presidency revealed in many educated, reasonable Russians. Whenever another American move riled our public, Obama’s big ears, the lilac hue in his lips, the athletic sturdiness of his wife were never late to arrive in the comments.

It all culminated when our national sports icon, a holder of multiple Olympic titles, now a profiled politician, published a photo of the Obamas mocking them with a banana on her Twitter. Apart from the tiny liberal minority, everyone else found the fact hilarious. It took a call from her daughter, who lives in America, to convince the lady to take her tweet down.

Putin

Obama had the kind of charisma and cool elegance that President Putin couldn’t dream about. Whenever they found themselves in the company of each other, our leader visually shrunk. He couldn’t help projecting the resulting feeling of discomfort on Obama’s personality and his politics.

Our loyalist media, acutely perceptive to President Putin's tastes, were quick to oblige. They systematically cut Obama down to size because his size—in terms of physical presence and global influence—was what riled our President the most. He was pictured as soft, indecisive and incompetent, all the features that we so much despise in our own bad rulers. The “overload” button that hapless Mme Clinton brought to Moscow in 2008 was a godsend as a symbol of this incompetence.

Clinton

The association with Madam Clinton during his second term was devastating for Obama in our eyes. President Putin and the entire mighty machine of our propaganda made her devil incarnate for her perceived role in the anti-Putinist wave of protests in 2011–2013, and the “color revolutions” around our perimeter.

The 2014 Crimea story brought it all to the head and marked the point of no return. But the singular biggest damage happened when Clinton jubilated at the news of Gaddafi’s disgraceful death from the hands of Western-backed insurgents. Putin watched the scene on the TV with terror: “This can happen to me, too.” For him, it became a symbol of American duplicity and brutality and seems to have marked our President for the rest of his life.

In the fan art below, Putin is beating the bejesus out of Obama. Creations like this one proliferated among patriotic Russians across the country and beyond. Amazingly, many patriotic Americans of Russian descent shared that feeling. In these pieces of art, President Putin is usually of the same size, or larger than Obama.




Answer by Dima Vorobiev, Former Soviet propaganda executive

Advantages Of Marrying An Ebira Woman

Ebira Wedding

If you are searching for advantages of marrying an Ebira woman from Kogi State, you are in the right place.

Quick facts about Ebira people:

  • They are generally referred to as Anebira.
  • Major parts of EBIRA Land is situated in the central part of Kogi state, Nigeria.
  • Ebira people are generally known to be rich in culture and tradition.

Getting married to an Ebira lady comes with benefits that cannot be overlooked, and if you are not yet married, you should consider marrying an Ebira lady because of the following benefits that awaits you:

Ebira women knows how to cook delicious delicacies

Afrcan dishes

Are you interested in eating different tasty delicacies? Then you should consider marrying an Ebira woman from Okene and environ, the average Ebira woman is versatile in the kitchen, they are good in cooking and in other house chores. Some delicious delicacies to enjoy from from Ebiraland are ìyá (pounded yam) and epi papara (egusi soup), draw soup, black soup, epe eza, epe igorigo, epe ebaatu, etc.

 Ebira women are talented and intelligent

Natasha Apoti

The typical Ebira woman is highly intelligent and talented in many fields. We have a lot of beautiful Ebira women working as engineers, doctors, Fashion designers lawyers, journalists, hair stylists, bead markers, and so on. They are most talented in crafts such as cloth weaving, embroidery and entertainment. So, when you marry an Ebira woman, be assured that she will bring something to the table with her talents. The average Ebira woman have the capacity to will proffer a logical solution to almost every problem you put before her.

They are beautiful and loving

Mercy Johnson and husband

If you’re contemplating whether you should marry an Ebira woman or not? You should remove doubts from your thoughts. Ebira women are considered the most physically attractive in Kogi state. They highly emotional and they seem to love deeply.

They are quite virtuous and religious

Majority of Ebira women practice either Christianity or Islam, while few adheres to the traditional African religion and they are devout to the core.

They value culture and tradition

Local Ebira women

Ebira women are known to hold at high esteem their culture and tradition. Most Ebira you will meet have respect for their culture and they display some cultural traits like respectful, decency and dignity. An Ebira woman will make respectful and responsible wife.

Bride price in Ebira land is not costly

Dowry in Ebira land

Payment of Bride price also known as Dowry is one of the first rights a man will take to give him legal and cultural right over the woman he’s seeing.

While some ethnic groups’ in Nigeria seem to place a high price on dowry during the marriage process, which in some cases the Grooms find it exuberant, Ebira culture encourages a friendly and affordable bride price. Thereby, process of marrying an Ebira woman is quiet easy and less expensive.

They are good in bedmatics

Image source: Google

It is a general belief that Ebira Women from Okene are good in bed. If you want to enjoy a great sex life when you get married, then you should consider marrying an Ebira woman.

Culled from kogistatehub.com

As a Nigerian, what is your honest opinion about the Hausa-Fulani, Igbo and Yoruba people of Nigeria?

Brace up, long answer. I'm Nigerian. I'm not Yoruba, Hausa, or Igbo. I can speak igbo though albeit not too well. I'm a minority, yes I'm so minor that in the North before 2011, I would have been taken for an igbo. That's how minor i am. I'm from the tribe of this man

Brace up, long answer. I'm Nigerian. I'm not Yoruba, Hausa, or Igbo. I can speak igbo though albeit not too well. I'm a minority, yes I'm so minor that in the North before 2011, I would have been taken for an igbo. That's how minor i am. I'm from the tribe of this man


Isaac Adaka Boro



Images from Google.

Without delving much into history, it would be nonetheless neccessary to give a background to my viewpoint about the three major tribes in Nigeria. Why should I do this? well obviously because that's the best way to give people an idea of how many Nigerians and there are alot of them (atleast 30% of the population), who are neither Hausa-fulani, Yoruba or Igbo view these tribes.

My late grandmother told me of how back in the 60′s during the Nigeria Biafra war, our people were tortured and killed in their droves. They were mostly unarmed and ran for their lives during the war, their sin was that their leaders had chosen to be on the side of Nigeria instead of Biafra. Not that the leaders did much of a representation anyway. I was also told by some of my uncles how prior to the war, in Port Harcourt city, the Igbos used tribal slurs and mostly took the natives to be low class. To make this apparent, I've had some experiences in that direction though to be fair, it does not in anyway represent the larger opinion of the Igbos today.

So who am I? I'm an Ijaw or Izon. We are over 15 million people(Ijaws make up about 10% of the population) and that's a conservative estimate especially in Nigeria where the more people you have, the more resources you are allocated to, whether you produce anything or not.

The man in the picture major Jasper Isaac Adaka Boro (1938-1968) was born in the oil producing community of Oloibiri(this is where oil was first discovered in Nigeria).


Oloibiri Today- image from google


There is even a movie by that name

He was basically from a family that was better off than the rest of the population. After his secondary education he joined the prestigious University of Nigeria, Nsukka and became an activist. He was also the student union leader there. He left all that, with an opportunity to probably go to Europe or America, to come back home to fight for the right for his people who were totally oppressed by the Hausa, Yoruba and Igbo dominated Nigerian state. Taking one of his reasons from his book “The 12 day Revolution” he stated that, despite the huge natural resources in the Niger Delta, the old women did not have access to clean drinking water. Children had no good schools to attend. The majority of the people were impoverished and really had no say in how they were governed. That was as far back as 1966 though this would seem like a description of the current Niger Delta. He was the first militant. Though he lost out in the battle against the Nigerian state, he was later released from prison to fight against the biafran forces during the civil war. He became a nationalist after his release from prison and believed that Biafra was not in anyway going to treat his people better. So he fought against Biafra and was later assassinated by a Nigerian Soldier, a Yoruba man towards the end of the war. His memory leaves on.

Now back to the question of how Nigerians view the the three major tribes, let me start this way, there are in my opinion two ways to view a people, generally and individually. They are both connected.

The Hausa-Fulani

Though there is no tribe called Hausa-fulani, its either Hausa or Fulani, but politically and religiously they are aligned so lets ignore that for the moment. Many people who claim to know the Hausa may infact not know too much about them. This is because for those who live in the southern part of Nigeria, they assume everyone from the North is Hausa or Fulani. In reality the north has so many tribes, and is not even homogenous religiously. Though we can all agree it's majority Muslim, but that's just about it.

I've had very close encounters with Hausa people, not just your typical aboki who shines shoes or does other menial jobs in the south or all around the country. I've met educated and high class Hausa and Fulanis. My honest opinion about them is that most of them do not really care about what happens elsewhere in the country. They are very religious and basically are not the easiest people to debate or discuss with. Religious arguments are really a no go area for them. I've noticed this to be true even for the Christain Hausa. Generally speaking, the Hausa or Fulanis believe they are meant to rule Nigeria unchallenged. They will discriminate other tribes especially non Muslims in general. Like I said this is on a general level. Let me illustrate from my own experience. I studied in a middle eastern country. Prior to that time, I basically still believed that Nigeria could have a more united future despite her current challenges. This believe was predicated on the fact that people are getting more educated and enlightened by the day and with a fledgling democracy, things would change. All these assertions were to be shattered not even in Nigeria but outside the shores of the country. I arrived my college. After a couple of days I noticed certain Nigerians were playing football together, and others chose other fields to play. I was relatively shocked to realise that the Muslim, Hausa, fulani and kanuris played football together. Other Nigerians, wether Igbos, Yorubas and a few Christian Hausas played together in a different field. It was mind boggling to me. I've asked myself how can one talk about a future united Nigeria if these young men who will eventually go back home and be in the helm of affairs are already acting this way. I've also been on a ship which had a mixed race of people. I was a cadet then doing my sea training. Once again it was the Muslim Hausa and Fulanis who were on that ship that went to request that the Christian and Muslim cadets should be separated. There were other nationals in that ship, but then my brothers from the North never cease to disappoint. These and many other encounters have shaped my opinion of the Hausa. I believe one Nigeria coming from an Hausa in general is not about a united Nigeria where everyone has a right to control their destiny but rather one in which the Northerners rule and circumvent the will of the south and use their resources to do whatever they desire.

The Yorubas

I've had Yoruba friends from as long as I can remember. I think I'm not alone in this regard. Yorubas are basically non violent and would debate you on anything, whether it's religion or politics or whatever it is. This in my opinion is one of the most attractive attributes about Yorubas in general. I also think the Yorubas understood the Nigerian terrain early enough to adopt an attitude of neutrality in order to protect their interest. Neutrality is really not neutral. As one would see, it's merely a political game of betting on both sides and whoever wins becomes your friend. This way you hardly loose. Enough of the politics and let's get down to it. I respect the Yorubas just like i respect any other tribe. Though I must say Yorubas put tribe above religion, and Igbos money above tribe, while the Hausa put religion above tribe. These are generalizations anyway and like they say about any generalization it coud usually be false including this one. My experience with Yourbas are endless because while I'm writing this, majority of my acquitances are Yorubas, I basically have them all around so I can say my opinion is not from hear say. Yorubas are naturally friendly people. They don't get aggressive easily, they respect elders, and also expect others to respect them. A Muslim Yoruba can attend a church service and would see no big deal to it. I believe they take religion for what it is it —a way to worship God. The common issue I've noticed with Yorubas is tribalism. I think this seems ironic since many people see them as neutral. When a Yoruba man does something wrong in the political scene, fellow Yorubas will find a soft spot for him. Sometimes excusing whatever that was done irrespective of the gravity of the offence. One such recent case was with the Nigerian Minister for Finance Kemi Adeosun, who has allegedly used a forged NYSC certificate and yet is been shielded by the government of the day. I've been shocked to notice that some of my anti-corruption Yoruba friends who i respect are not outraged about this, rather you would hear things like “well it's Nigeria na.” These same people would leap to the band wagon to condemn and criticize people who are accused of similar offences provided they are from the South. In general I think Nigeria would be alot better if other tribes learned some of the attributes of the Yorubas especially their non violent approach to burning issues, and the Yorubas would be better of if they come out of their self acclaimed neutrality and stand for equality and fairness in Nigeria, not just when it is politically convenient.

The Igbos

I could speak Igbo as early as when I was 6. I helped interpret the messages in church to my grand mom who didn't understand the language but attended an Igbo speaking Deeper life Bible Church. I've lived more with the Igbos than any other tribe and can easily pass for one if I wanted to. Here is my take on the Igbos. They are mostly objective and open minded. The individual igbos do not take politics to an extreme. They will not choose violence easily and like the Yorubas are open to debate. My personal experience with them have left me with a couple of ideas. A typical igbo would think you are brainwashed if you are from Niger Delta and does not support the Biafra agitation. I've had several arguments and interactions with them. Trying to point out to them that, if you assume you are intellectually superior to Niger Deltans then there is no way you can have them stand with you to achieve your aims. I understand in the Nigerian political game at the moment, my people are aligned with the Igbos, it wasn't always the case. There is alot I could say about the Igbos but let me summarise it this way. The Igbos I know are hardworking, shrewd in business, accommodating, and mostly nice to everyone. Anyone can live freely in an igbo state without fearing that someday some youths will wake up and start burning down buildings and killing people. They love music but most importantly most igbos I know are good at handling money. Their bad attributes are mostly in the area of assuming other tribes are less intelligent than them, yet this isn't peculiar to them but can be found among the Yorubas too.

So, before you react or rather respond to my opinion on this, please be aware that I judge people on an individual bases. I hardly care about what tribe you are from except we are discussing politics. Now about politics, I'm always saddened when I see how the three major tribes have ruined the country with their ethnic bickering and yet believe they should come first in everything just because they have larger numbers than others. Thanks for reading.



Edited by Samuel J. Doupregha, lives in Nigeria
#498293219 Thank ReportSeptember 6, 2018, 10:32:59 AM

Ijaw Culture: A brief walk into the lives of one of the world's most ancient people

Being the first to find a settlement in the Lower Niger and Niger Delta, it is possible that they may have started inhabiting this region as far back as 500 BC.

Ijaw Culture: A brief walk into the lives of one of the world's most ancient people

It is said that wherever there is a river an Ijaw born is not far off. Although this is not always the case yet those words hold great significance.

The Ijaws are a collection of people that are indigenous to the Niger Delta in Nigeria. And owing to the affinity they have with water, a good number of them are found as migrant fishermen in camps as far west as Sierra Leone and as far east as Gabon.

With a population of over fourteen million, the Ijaws are unarguably the most populous tribe inhabiting the Niger Delta region and arguably the fourth largest ethnic group in Nigeria.

Historically, it is almost impossible to give a precise account as to whence the Ijaws originated. Different accounts have been given by different historians. But what is certain is that the Ijaws are one the world’s most ancient people.

Believed to be the descendants of the autochthonous people or ancient tribe of Africa known as the (H) ORU, the Ijaws were originally known by this name (ORU). At least it was what their immediate neighbours deemed them.

Although this was a very long time ago, the Ijaws have, however, kept the ancient language and culture of the ORUs.

Being the first to find a settlement in the Lower Niger and Niger Delta, it is possible that they may have started inhabiting this region as far back as 500 BC.

However, language and cultural studies prove that they are related to the founders of the Great Nile Valley civilization complex (and possibly the lake Chad complex). They immigrated to West Africa from the Nile-Valley during antiquity.

The Ijaw language consists of two prominent groupings.

The first, which is termed as either Western or Central Izon (Ijaw) consists of Western Ijaw speakers: Ekeremor, Sagbama (Mein), Bassan, Apoi, Arogbo, Boma (Bumo), Kabo (Kabuowei), Ogboin, Tarakiri, and Kolokuma-Opokuma (Yenagoa).[citation needed] Nembe, Brass, and Akassa (Akaha) dialects represent Southeast Ijo (Izon).[citation needed]. Buseni and Okordia dialects are considered Inland Ijo.

On the other hand, the second major Ijaw linguistic group is Kalabari. Although the term Eastern Ijaw is not the right term, that is what Kalabari is considered as.

Kalabari is the name of one of the Ijaw clans that reside on the eastern side of the Niger-Delta (Abonnema, Buguma, Bakana, Degema etc.) who form a major group in Rivers State.

Other "Eastern" Ijaw clans are the Okrika, Ibani (the natives of Bonny, Finima, and Opobo) and Nkoroo. They are neighbours to the Kalabari people in present-day Rivers State, Nigeria.

Unlike most tribes, the Ijaws have two forms of marriage.

The first which is a small-dowry marriage, the groom is traditionally obliged to offer a payment to the wife’s family, which is typically cash.

Here (this type of marriage) the children trace their line of inheritance through their mother to her family: Meaning that when the children grow up, they have more choices as to where they can live.

They can either decide to live with their father’s people or mother’s people.

In contrast to the first type, the second type of marriage is a large-dowry marriage. And here the children belong to the father’s family.

With the coming of Western civilization, the present day Ijaw seems to have changed from traditional worshipers to Christianity.

However, there are some among them who still have faith in their traditional religious practices.

In the traditional religion of the Ijaws, veneration of ancestors plays a central. While water spirits, known as Owuamapu, figure prominently in the Ijaw pantheon.

In addition, the Ijaw practice a form of divination called Igbadai, in which recently deceased individuals are interrogated on the causes of their death.

They also believe that water spirits are like humans in having personal strengths and shortcomings and that humans dwell among the water spirits before being born.

Traditionally, the Ijaws hold celebrations to honour the spirits, lasting for several days. And the highlight the festival is the role of masquerades.

Here, men wearing elaborate outfits and carved masks dance to the beat of drums and manifest the influence of the water spirits through the quality and intensity of their dancing.

Particularly spectacular masqueraders are taken to actually be in the possession of the particular spirits on whose behalf they are dancing.

Interestingly, the Ijaws are one of the few peoples in the world known to practice ritual acculturation (enculturation).

In this practice, it is possible for an individual, who hails from an entirely different tribe or group, to become an Ijaw after undergoing some certain rites.

It is said that King Jaja of Opobo, the Igbo slave who rose to become a powerful Ibani (Bonny) chief in the 19th century, is an example.

It is important to note here that the term Ijaw is the anglicised version of Ijo or Ejo, a variation of Ujo or Ojo, the ancestor who gave the Ijo people their name.

President Tinubu bow to fuel subsidy as IMF confirmed

The Nigerian government has started paying subsidies again for the premium motor spirit (PMS), also known as petrol, according to the Int...